Stop losing sales to a slow storefront

No. A perfect lab score can require removing useful features and does not reliably predict revenue. We target Core Web Vitals using real customer data, which reflects the shopping experience and contributes to Google rankings. A better score is a likely benefit, rather than the goal.

We cannot estimate a gain before reviewing your store. Research links faster pages with better conversion, but the effect depends on your current speed, traffic and category. A store taking four seconds on mobile has more room to improve than one taking two seconds. The audit helps decide whether speed work is the best use of your budget.

Not necessarily. Some apps can load only on the pages that need them, preserving their features with less overhead. We recommend removal for unused apps, duplicate features or heavy scripts serving a limited purpose. We show you the performance cost of each app, and you decide.

Real visitor data uses a rolling 28-day window and needs enough traffic to be meaningful. It lets us report the same performance measures used for rankings and catch issues that appear under real traffic. Reporting immediately after release would rely on lab tests again.

Theme updates are fine because the work lives in your theme and is documented. App installs are the real risk, and that is why the report includes an evaluation checklist. Most performance regressions we see six months later trace to a single app added without anyone checking what it loads. If you want that watched continuously rather than checked once, it belongs in a managed services retainer.

Yes, as a separately priced project. Custom frontends need a review of unfamiliar code, build methods and rendering. The cause may require structural changes rather than tuning. We start with a paid audit to define the work.